In The Purple Prince of Oz, Ruth Plumly Thompson returned to the tiny kingdom of Pumperdink, to let us know the fates of the characters she had created in Kabumpo of Oz. Kabumpo, the Elegant Elephant, had made several previous appearances, often complaining that he was bored with his post-adventuring, domesticated life. He could make no such claims in this book, where he takes center stage in a plot with (almost) non-stop action.
Notably in a land where, in theory, no one ever ages or dies, the royal family of Pumperdink has aged, if not very much. Prince Pompadore and Peg Amy have settled down into a happy family life, with an adorable young daughter, rather startling in Oz, where most characters tended to form family relationships with friends, and where even Uncle Henry and Aunt Em have vanished for several books now. (This is, I think, the first baby born in the entire series.) Perhaps to illustrate the looseness of family ties in Oz, an Evil Uncle, untouched by the utter cuteness of the baby princess, decides to usurp the throne with the help of the old fairy from Kabumpo and a bit of evil magic. (No, nobody follows Ozma’s anti-magic laws. Nobody.)
The only ones left to save the royal family are Kabumpo and his new found page/servant, Randy, a boy with a touch of sarcasm and some self-esteem issues. (Thompson later implies that Randy’s father took off without saying a word to his son, possibly explaining the issues.) With misguided optimism, they head towards Ozma for help. A soothsayer (he says “sooth! sooth!” a lot) warns them that Ozma will be of absolutely no use to them. (I have to agree.) Instead, he advises them to seek out the Red Jinn—the owner of the magic dinner bell introduced in Jack Pumpkinhead of Oz.
Jinnicky, as he prefers to be called, takes an instant and mutual dislike to Kabumpo. The two spend the next several chapters exchanging sarcastic barbs as they attempt to rush back to save the Royal Family of Pumperdink—an attempt delayed by the now almost inevitable detours and sidetrips, including a meeting with yet another unauthorized magic user. This one defends his actions by loftily explaining that he is not a wizard, but a wozard. (Ah, semantics. Is there any law breaking that you can’t help us with?) The wozard is also building a private army of unstoppable wooden soldiers, something I would think would be illegal regardless of spelling, but after a few token protests about Ozma’s anti-magic laws, Kabumpo, Randy and Jinnicky merely nod in delight, and rush on to save the day and reveal Randy’s none-too-secret secret identity. (It probably helps that the wozard bribes them with a gift of a wooden soldier.) And none too soon, either—under the evil fairy, “Everything was against the law, and the law was against everything.” Sigh. Some evildoers just don’t know how to have fun.
The least interesting part of all of this is Randy’s “reveal,” which, as noted, is not all that revealing, given that the book is sorta named after him, a rather major giveaway. And, to further keep this from being a surprise, Thompson also inserted a chapter listing the various Things the Purple Prince Must Do To Earn His Kingdom, which not surprisingly just happens to follow the plot of the book), a list so long that she apparently felt impelled to repeat it at the end of the book, with explainations, probably from her awareness that her readers would have long forgotten the list by that point.
And, of course,the book has the now pretty much inevitable Ozma fail: quite apart from being unable to rescue the Royal Family, enforce her anti-magic laws, or prevent one of her subjects from creating an unstoppable private army, one able to disarm and imprison fairies, she allows a subject from another land to hurry off with one of the wooden soldiers with every stated intention of building his own army. If this army decides to conquer you, Ozma—and by all indications that won’t be too difficult—you can take comfort in knowing that it was entirely your fault.
But the rest of the book is considerably more intriguing. Published in 1932, the book focuses on the concepts of rightful rulership, and the dangers of rebelling against authority—a pointed message in the face of growing fears about the Soviet Union and the slow rise of facism in Italy and political turmoil in Weimar Germany. Like her contemporaries, Thompson was well aware of the evils that had resulted from the revolution against the established, aristocratic Russian tsars (if perhaps less aware of the multiple issues of Nicholas II’s reign that sparked the revolution in the first place). Pumperdink, under the rule of the evil fairy, draws clear parallels with the cheerlessness of the Soviet Union. Those who overthrow their rulers and leaders, the conservative Thompson notes, may not be all that happy with the results.
The book also reflects Thompson’s awareness of modern military developments. Along with the unstoppable wooden soldiers, she introduces a race of bad tempered people made of torpedos, so focused on weapons that they have become weapons themselves. But any qualms the torpedo people might raise about a focus on weapons—especially in a country at least verbally focused on peace, with an all powerful magic belt at its disposal eliminating—in theory—any need for advanced weaponry—is quickly overcome in the admiration for the unstoppable wooden soldiers, a striking contrast to the pacifism embraced in the Baum books. It’s a taste of the themes of military and conquest still to come.
Not that the book is entirely or even mostly serious; for the most part, it’s a delightful piece of froth, with one particularly marvelous detour to a dinner with a sad giant too small to live with giants, but too large to live with anyone else, delighted to finally find friends. Thompson was always at her best when she focused on her own characters, not Baum’s, as she does here. Alas, she was to return to Baum’s characters in her next book, with not always happy results.
Mari Ness admits that she sometimes wants an unstoppable wooden army, if only to do a bit of housecleaning for her. Or a lot of housecleaning. Unstoppable wooden soldiers can fight dirt, right? She lives in central Florida.
Yeah, sure, Neville would totally end up dating a young version of his grandmother.
I don’t understand why Hermoine should have had to end up with either of them?
I think it’s important for Harry to have female friends he can rely on and confide in without it being romantic, and I agree Harry belongs with Ginny, who matches his inner fire in a way Hermione just doesn’t.
I also agree Hermione doesn’t end up with Ron, but here I think JKR failed Ron’s character development. She wanted him (I think) to be the boy who was overshadowed at home by his brothers and overshadowed at school by Harry, but have hidden depths. This is seen as early as book 1, no one who can beat McGonagall at wizard chess can be a complete nitwit. But I think JKR dropped the ball on Ron’s character development in the last third of the series and those hidden depths never really came out, that would have made him a good match for Hermione.
I don’t really have a good alternative for Hermione in canon though. Maybe she meets someone at law school. Although I wonder if maybe she never does find someone. She may accept and understand that Harry is only a friend, and maybe she prefers it that way too, but who else could measure up to him as a friend, much less a boyfriend?
There was a post here at Tor not long ago about the sabotaging of Ron’s character that happened in the films–how the script-writers were so enamored of Hermione that they took many of Ron’s most courageous, impressive, and intelligent moments and flipped them over to her, and that Ron’s character ended up being little more than comic relief at best, and kind of snivvely at worst.
It makes me wonder. Rowling was a part of the process that took Ron’s best qualities and pasted them onto Hermione: Which Ron does she think Hermione doesn’t belong with–the book Ron or the movie Ron?
Well, honestly, the most YA-fantasy trope of the whole series is that people marry (and stay married to) their high-school sweethearts. I mean, who doesn’t think after a few fire whiskeys at Merlin U the whole gang isn’t out “exploring other options” and after a few angst-filled
monthsdays the vast majority of these relationships are dead and gone, to be resurrected for brief periods after they find each other on Wizard Facebook (or after a few glances while dropping their kids off on the train)…Has JKR actually said Hermione should be with Harry? Every quotation I’ve seen so far simply says she *shouldn’t* be with Ron.
I never understood the Harry/Hermione pairing. Maybe it’s because I’ve always had more guy-friends than girl-friends, but I saw my own platonic relationships echoed in what Harry and Hermione had. They were too much like siblings to be romantically involved in any way.
And while I still like Hermione/Ron, I knew it wasn’t terribly realistic. IIRC, Emma said the kisses with Rupert and Daniel were awkward because it was little kissing her brothers – that’s often what tends to happen with people who grow up together. Probably the more realistic option is that she’d meet someone while working for the Ministry, if she even married at all.
But Hermione/Neville? Can’t say I buy that one either. According to JKR, Neville marries Hannah Abbott (from Hufflepuff), and I can dig that.
Cute, but um, it feels like pairing her with Neville would be giving Hermione away to him like an award for being a nice boy. Which is a lot what her pairing with Ron already feels like. It’s not that Ron is an awful person, but it definitely feels like she is a lot more grown-up and mature than he is. Harry and Hermione at least feel on more equal footing.
Hermione didn’t need to end up romantically paired with anyone, but the natural pull of the narrative and the character interactions certainly seemed to point a lot more toward Harry than Ron–pairing up Ron and Hermione always felt forced to me, an authorial contrivance rather than a natural outgrowth. The whole pairing everyone up forever with their high school sweethearts feels like that too.
The films of course have a more visual logic to them–Daniel Radcliffe had more chemistry with Emma Watson, and apologies to Mr. Grint, he was the more handsome option; wouldn’t Hermione notice that?
JKR didn’t actually say Hermione should have been with Harry in the quotes that have been leaked from the interview, just that Hermione and Ron wouldn’t work out, she regrets putting them together and that the pairing was more wish fulfillment than anything. She’s not going to go back and rewrite the books so all the Ron/Hermione shippers can calm down, your ship is still canon.
I think it’s actually pretty self aware of her to admit that she paired them up for her own desires and not any real literary reason. The revelation doesn’t surprise me either because I’ve believed for years that she stuck to her original plan regardless of how she actually wrote the books and what would have worked better with what she actually wrote. I think there are many things this is true of in the books, not just who Hermione ended up with.
Very interesting! On the other Ron thread over at Tor, I read a pretty good explanation of why Harry/Ginny actually do make sense (and why Harry/Hermione wouldn’t) – although their relationship didn’t get developed as well as it could.
As for Hermione/Ron, while reading the books, I did root for them and think they had potential but agree that in some ways, Ron was wasted and maybe even Flanderized as a character. It actually set my teeth on edge a bit that in the epilouge he’s talking about cheating on his driver’s test, etc. So while I don’t think the general idea of Ron/Hermione is horrible (aside from the conceit of everybody marrying their high school sweetheart – which, hey, does work for some people, I know quite a few couples like that), it definitely wasn’t executed as well as it could have been, they COULD have really helped make it something that helped mature Ron’s character a bit – and it makes sense that the author now has second throughts about it.
While Hermione doesn’t need to be paired up with anybody, it seems most logical if she did end up with somebody, that she probably would have ended up with somebody she met in whatever the Wizarding college equivalent was (or in her professional life). I honestly don’t see the Neville/Hermione connection at all, this basically just seems to be saying ‘Well, Neville is another good male character, so he should get Hermione’ and not at all based on any connection that they actually have.
Also, I kind of loved that Viktor Krum liked Hermione and noticed her in that way when others couldn’t see her as more than a dowdy bookworm, even though I don’t necessarily think she should have ended up with him either.
(Also, not trying to open up a can of worms, I’m just trying to make a good natured joke so take it in that spirit, but the amount of excitement/and false statements regarding this (for example, this turning into ‘JK Rowling says she should have been with Harry’) is like the geek version of the media hullabaloo any time the Pope says anytthing. HE’S CHANGING EVERYTHING! :) )
Not to open up an entirely different can of worms, but one major reason Jill Pole didn’t end up with Eustace Scrubb was because she ended up DEAD while still in school
I may still be bitter.
A better example might be Digory and Polly, who didn’t end up together either but at least got to live to either middle or old age, depending upon how you interpret the time line.
I’ll now let you all go back to arguing about Hermione’s fate, which I have fewer opinions about :)